跳到主要内容Skip to main content
Tax, Legal & TRESA · Aug 19, 2026 · 14 min read
📖 Tax, Legal & TRESA

You Sold the Estate’s House as Executor — Can You Pay Yourself? Ontario Estate Trustee Compensation, and Why the “5% Rule” Isn’t Law

You were named estate trustee, sold the family home and spent months winding everything up. Ontario law does let you take a fee — but you don’t set the number, and the “5%” everyone quotes appears in no statute at all.

Arthur Zhao · Broker · AZ Real Estate Partners · 2026-08-19
Quick Answer

I am the estate trustee, I have sold the family home and spent months settling everything — am I allowed to pay myself, and how much?

Yes. Under Ontario’s Trustee Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.23, s.61(1), an estate trustee is entitled to a fair and reasonable allowance for the care, pains, trouble and time spent on the estate — an amount fixed by a judge of the Superior Court of Justice. Two things surprise people: you do not set the figure yourself, and there is no statutory percentage. The 5% you hear quoted (2.5% in, 2.5% out) is a convention the courts built over decades, and the judge tests it against five factors: the size of the estate, the responsibility you carried, the time you spent, the skill you showed and the results you achieved. If the will already fixes your compensation (s.61(5)), the will governs and s.61 does not apply.

Source: Ontario Trustee Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.23, s.61 (current e-Laws version, checked 2026-08-19); the percentage convention and five-factor review are common-law practice, not statute — drawn from Ontario estate-litigation commentary (WEL Partners), citing Toronto General Trusts Corp. v. Central Ontario Railway and Re Jeffery Estate. Educational content, not legal or tax advice.

I’m Arthur Zhao. Picture the moment the estate’s biggest cheque finally clears: the house has sold, the proceeds are sitting in the estate account, and you — the person named to run all of this — have to decide how much of that money to move into your own account for the work you put in. That decision feels like it is yours to make. It isn’t.

Here is what most people get wrong before they even start. They assume the fee is a figure you set and a percentage you are owed — the “5% of the estate” you meet in every online answer. But that 5% appears in no Ontario statute, and the amount is not yours to fix: the law pins it to a single standard, “fair and reasonable”, and hands the final say to a judge. Pay yourself off a rule of thumb and you may find the beneficiaries — or the court — pulling the money back.

What follows is how the fee actually gets decided: the statute that grants it, why selling the house cuts both ways in the math, who has to sign off before you keep a dollar, and whether the taxman treats it as income. Plus the one clause that, written into a will today, keeps the whole question off a courtroom floor. This is educational, not legal or tax advice — for your own estate, sit down with an estates lawyer and an accountant.

Administer the estate and sell the assets

Bring a passing of accounts before the court

The judge weighs the claim against the five factors

A fair and reasonable amount is allowed

The short answer: yes you can be paid — but you don’t set the amount

Lead with the one sentence that matters: in Ontario an estate trustee is entitled to a fee for handling the estate — but how much that fee is gets decided by a court on a standard of reasonableness, not by you.

The authority is Trustee Act s.61(1). In its own words, a trustee, guardian or personal representative is entitled to “such fair and reasonable allowance for the care, pains and trouble, and the time expended in and about the estate, as may be allowed by a judge of the Superior Court of Justice.”

Notice the two load-bearing phrases. One is fair and reasonable — that is the only legal standard the whole system runs on. The other is as may be allowed by a judge — which hands the final call to the court. You can claim a number, but a claim is not the same thing as money in your account.

The statute gives you three words, not a rate card

People assume estate law must hide a fee schedule somewhere — flip to the right page and read off the rate. There is no such schedule.

Ontario’s Trustee Act s.61 contains no percentage at all. The standard it sets is the single phrase fair and reasonable, and then it defers to the judge. As one Ontario estates firm puts it bluntly: there is “no statutory guidance” on how compensation is calculated — the whole method “has evolved through the common law.” A few other subsections in s.61 are worth knowing:

s.61(3) lets the judge approve a reasonable allowance when passing the accounts;
s.61(4) says that where the trustee is a solicitor who provided necessary legal services to the estate, that can be taken into account and an appropriate amount added;
s.61(5) says that if the instrument creating the trust — the will — already fixes the compensation, s.61 does not apply. The will wins.

That last one, s.61(5), is quietly the most useful subsection for an ordinary family. More on it at the end.

⚠️“Fair and reasonable” is not “whatever you like.” It is a legal standard a judge applies — the ceiling and floor are set by the court weighing five factors, not by what you feel your time was worth.

So where does that famous “5%” come from?

If the statute has no percentage, where does the “2.5% in, 2.5% out, roughly 5%” figure come from? It is a courtroom rule of thumb the judges built over many decades — not a line of legislation.

In Ontario estate practice the court typically starts by running a set of percentages: 2.5% on capital receipts (money coming in, such as the sale of the house), 2.5% on capital disbursements (money going out), 2.5% on revenue receipts and 2.5% on revenue disbursements. Where the estate is not wound up straight away and has to be managed over time, the court may add an annual care-and-management fee of about two-fifths of one percent (roughly 0.4%) of the average value of the assets. Add the four buckets together and you get that loose “about 5%.”

Two things to hold onto: first, this is a starting point, not the finish line; second, it has no binding force — the judge can push it down, or, less often, up. Treating it as “I am automatically owed 5%” is the single most common mistake people make here.

🚨Do not write yourself a cheque off the “5%.” It is only the court’s starting figure, not an amount you are automatically owed. Paying yourself without the beneficiaries’ consent or a passing of accounts invites an objection, and any excess can be clawed back.

The five factors the court uses to reality-check the number

Running the percentages is only step one. An Ontario court then tests the result against a set of five factors, which trace back to an old case (Toronto General Trusts Corp. v. Central Ontario Railway) and get cited again in later ones such as Re Jeffery Estate:

1. the magnitude of the estate — how big the job was;
2. the care and responsibility involved — how much you shouldered and how much risk you carried;
3. the time occupied — the hours you actually put in;
4. the skill and ability shown;
5. the success of the administration — how well it all turned out.

These five are the brake that pulls a cold percentage back to reality. A large but low-effort estate can see the fee trimmed below the tariff; a modest estate that put you through the wringer — litigation, disputes, a difficult property — can see it nudged up. The court is looking at what the job actually took, not just what the assets were worth.

How the house you sold feeds into the number

This is where the topic meets the sale itself. In most estates the house is the single biggest number, and it enters the compensation math from two directions:

• the proceeds of the sale land in capital receipts — sell the home for $800,000 and that $800,000 sits in the “money in” column;
paying out the beneficiaries and clearing the mortgage land in capital disbursements — the “money out” column.

So the sale inflates both sides of the tariff, which is why estates that involve selling a home tend to throw off a larger starting figure. But that is only the starting figure. If the house was handed to a listing agent and sold cleanly with little effort from you, a judge weighing the five factors may well decide the care and responsibility you personally brought to that piece was limited, and trim the corresponding fee. A high sale price does not automatically mean a bigger cheque for you — the court looks at what you did for it, not what it was worth.

Who actually signs off: the passing of accounts

You cannot simply move money from the estate account into your own and call it done. Your fee is either agreed to in writing by all the beneficiaries, or it goes through a court process called a passing of accounts.

On a passing of accounts the estate trustee files a formal set of estate accounts and asks the court to approve them — and to approve the compensation and costs at the same time (this is exactly the moment s.61(3) refers to). The procedure lives in Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 74. A few points matter most to a reader:

• the beneficiaries are served and are entitled to review the accounts;
• a beneficiary who disagrees can file a formal Notice of Objection before the hearing, including an objection aimed specifically at the amount of compensation;
• if no one objects, the court can generally grant judgment approving the accounts and the compensation without a hearing.

In other words, your fee is not settled by private back-and-forth with the beneficiaries — it is put in front of a court, with a process and remedies attached. Which is exactly why the mechanics of a passing of accounts are best left to an estates lawyer.

How the fee is taxed depends on who you are

Personal executor (family member)
Professional executor (in the course of a business)
CRA’s name for the income
Income from an office or employment
Business income
The dividing line
You did not act in the regular course of a business
You acted as executor in the course of a business
How CRA says it is reported
On a T4 slip in box 14 — CPP and income tax deducted, EI is not
As fees for service, part of your business income
A typical person
A son or daughter named in the will
A lawyer or accountant handling a client’s estate
💡 Either way it is taxable to you — money you earned, not part of the estate you inherit. CRA sets this out on its “Payments of fees for services” page (updated 2026-06-25), and treats a fee paid to someone acting under a power of attorney the same way. The exact forms, thresholds and whether anything must be withheld are still an accountant’s question — get advice before you file.

ℹ️Compensation and tax are two separate specialists’ questions: an estates lawyer for the amount, an accountant for the tax. This article gives you the framework, not the figures for your specific estate.

The one move that spares the fight: fix it in the will

If you take one practical thing away, take this. The cleanest way to avoid a compensation fight is to deal with it before anyone has to argue — by naming the estate trustee’s compensation in the will itself.

That is what s.61(5) is for: once the will fixes the fee, s.61 does not apply, and there is nothing for the beneficiaries to litigate over. You can set a fixed dollar figure, a percentage, or a formula. Compare that to the default: no words in the will, the trustee claims a number after the death, someone objects, and a judge ends up deciding it at real cost to the estate. One sentence in a will, drafted while everyone is alive and calm, quietly closes off a dispute that would otherwise land on your children.

💡 Here’s my own take: if you are the one making a will, the single most useful thing you can do is state the executor’s compensation in the will — s.61(5) of the Trustee Act says plainly that once the will fixes it, the section does not apply. I have watched too many families fall out over “how much the executor should get” only after the death, because nothing was written down, it became one word against another, and a judge settled it at real expense. And if you are the executor: keep every receipt, every disbursement, and a log of your time from day one. The five factors a court uses put real weight on the time you spent and the responsibility you carried — and those are proved by your records, not by your say-so. Compensation is earned on the accounts, line by line; it is not asserted from a feeling.

Sources cited in this article

Frequently Asked Questions

Q

Do all the beneficiaries have to agree before I can take a fee?

A

Not necessarily. If the will fixes your compensation, or every beneficiary agrees in writing to the amount you claim, you generally do not need a court order. But if even one beneficiary disagrees, the amount has to be fixed by a Superior Court judge on a passing of accounts, on a fair-and-reasonable standard (Trustee Act s.61(1) and (3)).

Q

The only real asset was the house — how does selling it change my fee?

A

The sale proceeds count as capital receipts and go into the base the court uses to start the calculation, so a home sale does push the starting figure up. But that is only the start. The judge still weighs the five factors, and if the sale took little effort on your part, the amount actually allowed can come in well below a flat percentage of the price.

Q

Can I be both the executor and a beneficiary and still get paid?

A

Yes. Your share as a beneficiary and your fee as the estate trustee are two different things. Just remember they are treated differently for tax: the fee is generally your personal taxable income, while an inheritance usually is not. An accountant can help you keep the two straight.

Q

Is executor compensation taxable?

A

Usually, yes. A fee you earn as an estate trustee is generally treated as your personal taxable income — most often as income from an office — rather than a tax-free inheritance. If you act as an executor in the course of a business (for example, a lawyer or accountant), it is generally reported as business income instead. Ask an accountant about the exact reporting for your situation.

Q

If the will already says what I get, can the court change it?

A

Generally no. Trustee Act s.61(5) provides that where the will fixes the compensation, s.61 does not apply and the will governs. That is exactly why setting the fee in the will is the most direct way to head off a dispute later.

Have a Question?

Arthur Zhao

Real Estate Broker · FRI · ABR · SRS · PSA · MCNE · E-PRO · CLHMS & GUILD Elite · REAIS

VP & Branch Manager, Bay Street Group Inc.

Get expert answers on buying, selling, and renting in the GTA


Discover more from GTA Real Estate Broker | Arthur Zhao

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

AZ
作者简介About the author
Arthur Zhao
Real Estate Broker · FRI · ABR · SRS · PSA · MCNE · E-PRO · CLHMS & GUILD Elite · REAIS
VP & Branch Manager, Bay Street Group Inc.

为大多伦多地区客户服务的双语经纪。专注于为首购、投资者和跨境家庭提供有结构的策略。先看透,再落笔。Bilingual broker serving the Greater Toronto Area. Specialty: structured strategy for first-time buyers, investors, and cross-border families. Knowledge before commitment.

还有疑问?Still have questions?

和 Arthur 聊聊。Talk with Arthur.

免费 30 分钟咨询 · 中英双语 · 无销售压力。讲清楚你的情况,我给你下一步建议。Free 30-minute consultation · Bilingual · No pressure pitch. Tell me your situation; I'll show you the next step.

免费咨询 →Book a consult → Email
Continue reading

相关文章Related articles

Tax, Legal & TRESA

Can Your Agent Buy the House You Are Selling? What Ontario Law Entitles You to First

In Ontario, an agent can buy a home they are listing, or have a relative or numbered company do it — but only once TRESA section 32 is met: written notice to every other party, plus their written acknowledgment of receipt. The notice must fully disclose every fact affecting the home’s value, and any resale the agent already has lined up. Broker Arthur Zhao explains what you are owed, why acknowledging receipt is not agreeing to the price, and why to get independent legal advice.

Aug 16, 2026
Tax, Legal & TRESA

Passing the Family Farm to Your Kids in Ontario: The Land Transfer Tax Break Is Real — and Narrower Than “Family” Suggests

Thinking of handing your Ontario farm to your kids tax-free? The land transfer tax exemption under Regulation 697 is real — but a field you have cash-rented to a neighbour may not count as “farming” at all, which can sink the claim before it starts. It waives only the provincial tax; the transfer’s principal purpose must be to keep farming rather than sell and subdivide; routing it through a family farm corporation adds a 95% farming-assets test; and Form 013-1205 must be filed. Broker Arthur Zhao maps out who actually qualifies.

Aug 16, 2026
Tax, Legal & TRESA

Leaving a Home or Inheritance to a Disabled Child on ODSP: The Henson Trust and the $100,000 Ceiling

Worried that leaving a home or savings to an adult child on ODSP will end their benefits? Broker Arthur Zhao explains why it usually won't — if you get two things right. First, a home the child lives in is already an exempt asset (O. Reg. 222/98 s.28(1)), so the real issue is cash against a $40,000 limit. Second, how a trustee spends matters as much as how money is held: paying disability-related bills directly is uncapped and income-exempt (s.43(1) para 9), while cash to the beneficiary is limited to $10,000 per 12 months (para 13). A fully discretionary Henson trust escapes the $100,000 trust ceiling (s.28(3)); an RDSP adds an uncapped exempt layer. Must be drafted by a licensed lawyer.

Aug 15, 2026
您好!想了解房产买卖、投资、贷款?随时问我。 点这里开聊 →
Arthur Zhao

AZ 房产 AI 顾问

Arthur Zhao · Real Estate Broker

选个话题快速开始
Powered by AZ Real Estate Partners · 对话用于改进服务

Discover more from GTA Real Estate Broker | Arthur Zhao

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading