跳到主要内容Skip to main content
Tax, Legal & TRESA · Aug 7, 2026 · 12 min read
📖 Tax, Legal & TRESA

Landlord Won’t Repair or Keeps Barging In? Filing a T2 or T6 With Ontario’s LTB

A T6 for what is broken, a T2 for how you are treated — but the Board decides on proof, not grievance. Here is how to build a case that survives a hearing, and the one deadline that quietly kills most of them.

Arthur Zhao · Broker · AZ Real Estate Partners · 2026-08-07
Quick Answer

In Ontario, how does a tenant actually file a complaint when the landlord won’t repair or keeps entering illegally?

Two forms, one deadline, and a paper trail decides it. If the landlord will not repair, you file a T6 (Application about Maintenance); if the landlord enters illegally, changes your locks, or harasses you, you file a T2 (Application about Tenant Rights). Both go to the Landlord and Tenant Board under section 29 of the Residential Tenancies Act — and both live under one hard limit: s.29(2) bars any application filed more than one year after the conduct occurred. Filing costs $48 through the Tribunals Ontario Portal, or $53 by mail or in person. What wins these cases is not how wronged you feel — it is what you can document: dated notices, photos, and a clean timeline the Board can follow.

Sources: LTB Forms, Filing and Fees page and Interpretation Guideline 6 (Tenant Rights); Residential Tenancies Act (S.O. 2006, c.17) s.29(2). Reviewed August 2026.

I am Arthur Zhao. After years on both sides of these disputes, here is the first thing I ask a furious tenant: not what happened, but what you can show. The LTB does not run on grievance — it runs on evidence, and that single fact changes how you should approach the whole thing.

This is not a piece about who is responsible for what; that is a separate article. It is about proof: when the landlord will not repair, or keeps letting himself in, how you turn a legitimate complaint into something the Board can act on — and how tenants who are clearly in the right still lose because they arrive with nothing in hand.

The question that actually decides your case: can you prove it?

Before the forms, understand the filter you are really being measured against. It is not who is right — it is what you can put in front of the Board. Get that backwards and a genuine grievance evaporates at the hearing.

Two things get sorted at the door. Is your problem with the unit — something broken the landlord will not fix (no heat, a leak, pests, a safety hazard)? That is a breach of the duty to maintain under s.20, and it goes on a T6 (Application about Maintenance). Is it with the landlord’s conduct — entering without notice, changing your locks, cutting a service, harassment? That violates your tenant rights under s.21 to s.27, and it goes on a T2 (Application about Tenant Rights). Both are filed with the Landlord and Tenant Board under section 29 of the Residential Tenancies Act — and both trade in the same currency: proof.

💡 My honest take: these applications are rarely lost on the merits — they are lost on two things, the deadline and the evidence. I have watched tenants sit on a legitimate complaint for over a year, only to have s.29(2) shut the door before anyone looks at the facts. And I have watched tenants arrive at a hearing full of righteous anger and unable to produce a single dated photo or written message. Being right is not enough at the LTB; you have to be able to prove it — which is why everything below is organized around building that proof, not around the order of the paperwork.

First filter: are you still inside the one-year window?

Before you gather a single document, check the clock — if you are out of time, none of the evidence matters. RTA s.29(2) bars any application filed more than one year after the conduct occurred; past that line the Board has no power to hear it, however clearly the landlord was in the wrong. A one-time act — a single illegal entry — counts from the day it happened; an ongoing problem — heat out for months, sustained harassment — is generally measured from the day it ended. That second rule is often contested, so do not lean on it: if your issue has run for most of a year, treat filing as urgent.

What proves a T2 versus what proves a T6

If it is a T2 (your rights)
If it is a T6 (the unit)
The core thing to prove
That the landlord acted — and that you did not consent
That the defect exists and the landlord knew about it
Documents that carry it
Notices of entry, or proof none were given; photos of changed locks; harassing texts and emails
Timestamped repair requests; photos or video of the defect; receipts for costs you covered
The timeline you build
A dated log of each incident: date, time, what happened, any witnesses
A dated chain: when you reported it, what the landlord said or ignored, how long it lasted
What the Board looks for
A pattern falling outside the s.26 / s.27 entry rules
That you told the landlord before applying (s.30(2)) and gave a real chance to fix it
💡 Same lesson on both sides: the Board rewards what is dated, written, and specific. Feelings do not survive a hearing — a timeline does.

Building the evidence file

Start the file the day the problem starts, not the week before the hearing. Save everything, and convert anything verbal into writing: after a phone call, send a one-line text — “confirming the leak we just discussed, please address it” — and that message becomes evidence. Screenshots should show dates; photos and video should carry timestamps.

One legal edge most tenants miss, and it weighs most on a T6: RTA s.30(2) requires the Board, when deciding your remedy, to consider whether you told the landlord about the problem before you applied. Notifying in writing first is not politeness — it is a factor that can raise or shrink your abatement. So the written report does double duty: it proves the problem existed, and it proves you gave the landlord a chance to fix it.

Turn evidence into the form: incidents, not adjectives

Download the T2 or T6 from the LTB website, then resist the urge to vent — vague complaints lose. Do not write “the landlord harasses me constantly”; write “on March 5, 2026, at approximately 9 p.m., the landlord entered without notice and stayed about 20 minutes.” Every claim should map to a specific date, place, account, and a numbered exhibit in your file. The form also asks what you want — the abatement amount, an order to repair, compensation — so decide the remedy before you file, not at the hearing.

⚠️One rule while you build this: do not take matters into your own hands. In Ontario you cannot withhold or dock rent because a repair was ignored, and you cannot change the locks to keep the landlord out. Either move can flip the case against you — unpaid rent invites an N4 eviction notice. The paper trail and the LTB are your only lawful levers here, full stop.

Filing, fees, and the fee waiver

File with the LTB. The Tribunals Ontario Portal is the practical choice — it costs $48, less than the alternatives, and lets you track status in real time. You can also file by mail or courier, or in person at a ServiceOntario centre, for $53. The fee is non-refundable; once it is paid you get a file number, which goes on everything afterward. If the fee is a genuine hardship, submit a Fee Waiver Request at the same time — low-income applicants can have it waived, so cost is not a reason to stay silent.

At the hearing: serve early, let the timeline talk

The LTB sets a hearing date, and most hearings now run by video. The work is front-loaded: organize your file into a clean, numbered timeline, and serve your key documents on the landlord and the Board ahead of the deadline in the LTB’s rules — evidence sprung on the day may be refused. At the hearing itself, do not perform outrage; walk the adjudicator through the chronology and let the documents speak. You can represent yourself, bring a licensed paralegal or lawyer, and request a free interpreter if you need one. The decision — the order — usually arrives afterward in writing.

What your proof can buy: the remedies

Win, and the Board can do far more than scold the landlord. The usual remedies:

Rent abatement: part of the rent you paid returned, scaled to the severity and duration of the problem — the most common outcome.
An order to comply: repair by a deadline (T6), or stop the conduct and not repeat it (T2).
Compensation: reasonable out-of-pocket costs, and property that was damaged or disposed of.
Authority to repair (T6): in serious cases, permission to arrange the work yourself, at the landlord’s expense, and deduct it from rent.
Ending the tenancy: where the unit is genuinely uninhabitable.
Administrative fine (mainly on a T2): for egregious conduct, payable to the Board — capped by statute at the greater of $10,000 or the Small Claims Court monetary limit (RTA s.31).

ℹ️Calibrate what a win looks like. In everyday cases the practical result is a rent abatement — a percentage of your rent back for the period you were affected. The administrative fine is reserved for bad-actor landlords, and it is paid to the Board, not to you. Treat the LTB as a tool to get the problem fixed and recover some rent, not as a payday.

“He keeps coming in”: when annoyance becomes an illegal-entry case

Not every unwanted visit is illegal — knowing the line tells you whether you have a T2. Under RTA s.27, a landlord can enter for a repair, inspection, or showing only with written notice at least 24 hours ahead, and the notice must state the reason, the date, and a time between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. A landlord who shows up at 7 a.m., or with no written notice, or “just to check on things,” is outside those rules.

The exceptions under s.26 are narrow: a genuine emergency, your consent at the time, regular cleaning if your lease requires it (8 a.m. to 8 p.m.), or showing the unit to prospective tenants after a notice to end the tenancy has been given. Anything past that — repeated, unannounced, or off-hours entry — is exactly what a T2 illegal-entry claim is for. Log each instance with the date, time, and whether any notice was given; that log is your case.

📘Complete GuideFirst-Time Renter Guide

Frequently Asked Questions

Q

Exactly when does the one-year clock start?

A

It depends on whether the problem is a single event or ongoing. A one-time act — a single illegal entry, say — counts from the day it happened. An ongoing problem — heat out for months, sustained harassment — is generally measured from the day it stopped. Because that line is often contested, the safe move is simple: once you have notified the landlord in writing and gotten nowhere, file promptly rather than testing the edge of s.29(2).

Q

What evidence actually convinces the Board?

A

Dated, contemporaneous, and in writing. Timestamped texts or emails beat memory every time; photos and video should show the date. For a T6, a chain of written repair requests with no response is powerful. For a T2, notices of entry (or proof none were given) plus a log of each incident does the work. Organize it into a numbered timeline before the hearing — the Board follows a clear chronology far better than a stack of loose screenshots.

Q

Can I file a T2 and a T6 at the same time?

A

Yes. They are separate forms for separate problems, but nothing stops you from filing both and asking the LTB to hear them together. That way a single hearing deals with the ignored repairs and the rights violation at once. Just make sure each form independently sets out its own specific incidents and attaches its own evidence.

Q

What actually happens at the hearing?

A

Most LTB hearings are now held by video. You and the landlord each present your side; you walk through your timeline and evidence, and the adjudicator can ask questions. Serve your key documents on the landlord and the Board in advance under the LTB’s rules — evidence sprung on the day may not be accepted. You can represent yourself, bring a licensed paralegal or lawyer, and request a free interpreter if you need one. A decision (order) usually follows in writing.

Have a Question?

Arthur Zhao

Real Estate Broker · FRI · ABR · SRS · PSA · MCNE · E-PRO · CLHMS & GUILD Elite · REAIS

VP & Branch Manager, Bay Street Group Inc.

Get expert answers on buying, selling, and renting in the GTA


Discover more from GTA Real Estate Broker | Arthur Zhao

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

AZ
作者简介About the author
Arthur Zhao
Real Estate Broker · FRI · ABR · SRS · PSA · MCNE · E-PRO · CLHMS & GUILD Elite · REAIS
VP & Branch Manager, Bay Street Group Inc.

为大多伦多地区客户服务的双语经纪。专注于为首购、投资者和跨境家庭提供有结构的策略。先看透,再落笔。Bilingual broker serving the Greater Toronto Area. Specialty: structured strategy for first-time buyers, investors, and cross-border families. Knowledge before commitment.

还有疑问?Still have questions?

和 Arthur 聊聊。Talk with Arthur.

免费 30 分钟咨询 · 中英双语 · 无销售压力。讲清楚你的情况,我给你下一步建议。Free 30-minute consultation · Bilingual · No pressure pitch. Tell me your situation; I'll show you the next step.

免费咨询 →Book a consult → Email
Continue reading

相关文章Related articles

Tax, Legal & TRESA

You Sold the Estate’s House as Executor — Can You Pay Yourself? Ontario Estate Trustee Compensation, and Why the “5% Rule” Isn’t Law

Named as the estate trustee, you sold the family home and spent months settling the estate — are you allowed to pay yourself, and how much? Yes: Ontario’s Trustee Act, s.61(1), entitles an estate trustee to a “fair and reasonable” allowance, fixed by a Superior Court judge. The catch most people miss: the famous “5%” (2.5% in, 2.5% out) is not a statutory rate — it is a courtroom convention judges have built over decades, then dial up or down against five factors. Broker Arthur Zhao breaks down the legal basis, how the house sale feeds the math, who signs off, whether it is taxed, and the one move that spares your family a fight. Educational content, not legal or tax advice.

Aug 19, 2026
Tax, Legal & TRESA

Can Your Agent Buy the House You Are Selling? What Ontario Law Entitles You to First

In Ontario, an agent can buy a home they are listing, or have a relative or numbered company do it — but only once TRESA section 32 is met: written notice to every other party, plus their written acknowledgment of receipt. The notice must fully disclose every fact affecting the home’s value, and any resale the agent already has lined up. Broker Arthur Zhao explains what you are owed, why acknowledging receipt is not agreeing to the price, and why to get independent legal advice.

Aug 16, 2026
Tax, Legal & TRESA

Passing the Family Farm to Your Kids in Ontario: The Land Transfer Tax Break Is Real — and Narrower Than “Family” Suggests

Thinking of handing your Ontario farm to your kids tax-free? The land transfer tax exemption under Regulation 697 is real — but a field you have cash-rented to a neighbour may not count as “farming” at all, which can sink the claim before it starts. It waives only the provincial tax; the transfer’s principal purpose must be to keep farming rather than sell and subdivide; routing it through a family farm corporation adds a 95% farming-assets test; and Form 013-1205 must be filed. Broker Arthur Zhao maps out who actually qualifies.

Aug 16, 2026
您好!想了解房产买卖、投资、贷款?随时问我。 点这里开聊 →
Arthur Zhao

AZ 房产 AI 顾问

Arthur Zhao · Real Estate Broker

选个话题快速开始
Powered by AZ Real Estate Partners · 对话用于改进服务

Discover more from GTA Real Estate Broker | Arthur Zhao

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading