跳到主要内容Skip to main content
Selling · Jun 24, 2026 · 6 min read
📖 Selling

Ontario’s SPIS (Form 220): Should a Seller Fill It Out?

It’s voluntary in Ontario — and the moment you answer, the “buyer beware” shield comes down

Arthur Zhao · Broker · AZ Real Estate Partners · 2026-06-23
Quick Answer

Is Ontario’s SPIS (Seller Property Information Statement) mandatory?

No. In Ontario the SPIS is voluntary — listing or selling does not require one. The SPIS (OREA Form 220) is a self-disclosure questionnaire the seller fills in about the home’s known condition. Lawyers describe it as “not legally required.” Who it favours hinges on one fact: once a seller “breaks silence” by answering, caveat emptor (buyer beware) no longer protects them on the answered points.

Sources: OREA Form 220 (Revised 2013); Ontario real-estate lawyer commentary (Cheadles, Merovitz Potechin, Bob Aaron); case: Picard v Grgurich (Div. Ct.). General information, not legal advice.

The SPIS is the form I most often see a seller use with good intentions and bad results. Many sellers think filling it out shows transparency and reduces disputes; Ontario case law and the prevailing view among lawyers suggest the opposite. Here is what it is, how it shifts legal exposure, why many lawyers advise against signing, and what you as a buyer should make of it.

Seller receives SPIS

Is it voluntary? Yes

Weigh disclosure vs. liability

Decide to complete or not

Buyer still does own diligence
1

What the SPIS is and what it covers

The SPIS (OREA Form 220) is a seller self-disclosure questionnaire in three parts — General, Environmental, and Improvements & Structural — with about 44 questions covering title/easements/survey, zoning compliance, nearby development, fuel tanks, flooding, UFFI/asbestos, wiring type (copper / aluminum / knob-and-tube), roof/moisture/pests, pools and more. The seller answers each YES/NO/UNKNOWN/N/A and signs; the buyer acknowledges receipt. Its banner states the purpose is “in part to protect Sellers by establishing that correct information … is being provided to buyers.”

ℹ️If a seller does complete an SPIS, answer every item truthfully based on current actual knowledge and review it with your real-estate lawyer. Honestly marking “UNKNOWN” is far safer than guessing a “no.”

2

It’s voluntary — you can decline to complete it

There is no Ontario law requiring a seller to complete an SPIS, and listing or selling doesn’t need one. The form itself even reminds buyers: “BUYERS MUST STILL MAKE THEIR OWN ENQUIRIES … the Sellers’ knowledge of the property may be inaccurate or incomplete.” ⚠️ Historically, a few local boards mandated SPIS at the board level (e.g. Thunder Bay), but that’s a private board rule — not provincial law, and not a TRREB/Toronto rule. In the GTA, the SPIS is not mandatory.

⚠️Don’t confuse two things: a lawyer-review condition (contractual) is not the 10-day statutory cooling-off right that applies to pre-construction condos. The SPIS is a voluntary disclosure questionnaire, not a rescission right.

3

The tension: buyer beware vs. disclosing known latent defects

Ontario resale runs on caveat emptor (buyer beware), but it isn’t absolute. Patent defects — discoverable on a reasonable inspection — generally carry no duty to point out (unless actively concealed). For latent defects — hidden ones an ordinary buyer wouldn’t find — the seller’s disclosure duty is narrow: a known latent defect must be disclosed only where it makes the home dangerous or unfit for habitation, or where the seller conceals it or misrepresents. There is no general duty to volunteer everything you know.
4

Why many lawyers advise against signing

The key mechanism is “breaking silence.” In Picard v Grgurich (Ontario Div. Court), once a seller answers and signs the SPIS they can no longer rely on caveat emptor — the answers become representations a buyer can sue on. Lawyers like Bob Aaron note the form is “complicated, highly technical and ambiguous,” accurate completion all but needs a team of professionals, and signing “exponentially raises the chances of being sued”; Merovitz Potechin flatly advises “sellers should not sign the SPIS.” In Small Claims (Shen v. Maiolo), a seller who answered “no” on moisture was held partly liable (note: Small Claims decisions are persuasive only).

💡 The SPIS’s “this is not a warranty” language does not immunize a seller from misrepresentation liability. One carelessly wrong “no” can become legal exposure — which is exactly why the bar is cautious.

What a buyer should take from it

Treat the SPIS as a starting point, not a guarantee: the form expressly says it’s for information only, not a warranty, and that buyers must make their own enquiries and may hire an inspector. It is not a substitute for a professional inspection, Status Certificate review or title search. “UNKNOWN” answers are common — that’s the seller declining to represent on that point, shifting diligence back to you, not a clean bill of health. For a buyer, the SPIS’s main value is evidentiary: if a seller answered “no” to something they actually knew, the form becomes a written record supporting a misrepresentation claim.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q

Is an SPIS mandatory when selling in Ontario?

A

No. The SPIS (OREA Form 220) is voluntary in Ontario; listing or selling doesn’t require it. A few local boards historically mandated it, but that’s not provincial law and not a GTA/TRREB rule.

Q

Does a seller have a duty to disclose defects?

A

A narrow one. Ontario runs on caveat emptor: patent defects generally need not be volunteered; a known latent defect must be disclosed only if it makes the home dangerous or unfit for habitation, or if the seller conceals or misrepresents. There’s no general duty to disclose everything you know.

Q

Why do lawyers often advise sellers not to sign an SPIS?

A

Because answering “breaks silence,” removing caveat-emptor protection on answered points (Picard v Grgurich); the form is complex and error-prone, and a wrong answer can be misrepresentation and raise lawsuit risk. The “not a warranty” language doesn’t immunize against misrepresentation.

Q

What should a buyer do with an SPIS?

A

Treat it as a starting point, not a guarantee — still get an inspection, Status Certificate review and title search. “UNKNOWN” is common and means the seller isn’t representing on that item. Its main value is evidentiary if a seller misanswered something they knew.

Have a Question?

Arthur Zhao

Real Estate Broker · FRI · ABR · SRS · PSA · MCNE · E-PRO · GUILD Elite

VP & Branch Manager, Bay Street Group Inc.

Get expert answers on buying, selling, and renting in the GTA


Discover more from GTA Real Estate Broker | Arthur Zhao

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

AZ
作者简介About the author
Arthur Zhao
Real Estate Broker · FRI · ABR · SRS · PSA · MCNE · E-PRO · GUILD Elite
VP & Branch Manager, Bay Street Group Inc.

为大多伦多地区客户服务的双语经纪。专注于为首购、投资者和跨境家庭提供有结构的策略。先看透,再落笔。Bilingual broker serving the Greater Toronto Area. Specialty: structured strategy for first-time buyers, investors, and cross-border families. Knowledge before commitment.

还有疑问?Still have questions?

和 Arthur 聊聊。Talk with Arthur.

免费 30 分钟咨询 · 中英双语 · 无销售压力。讲清楚你的情况,我给你下一步建议。Free 30-minute consultation · Bilingual · No pressure pitch. Tell me your situation; I'll show you the next step.

免费咨询 →Book a consult → Email
Continue reading

相关文章Related articles

您好!想了解房产买卖、投资、贷款?随时问我。 点这里开聊 →
Arthur Zhao

AZ 房产 AI 顾问

Arthur Zhao · Real Estate Broker

选个话题快速开始
Powered by AZ Real Estate Partners · 对话用于改进服务

Discover more from GTA Real Estate Broker | Arthur Zhao

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading