You Can’t Just Add Any Clause to an APS:Ontario Contract Law Basics
Arthur Zhao · AZ Real Estate Partners
AZ AZ Real Estate Partners Contract Law · Buyer’s Guide
AZ Real Estate Partners
You Can’t Just Add Any Clause to an APS:Ontario Contract Law Basics
An Agreement of Purchase and Sale is a binding legal document. Understanding what you can and cannot write into it protects you before, during, and after closing.
Legal Limits
Contract Risk
Buyer Protection
Why can’t you just write whatever you want into a real estate contract?
An Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) in Ontario is governed by contract law, the Trust in Real Estate Services Act (TRESA, 2023), the Ontario Human Rights Code, and local zoning bylaws. Every clause — whether standard or custom — must meet three legal tests: it must be lawful, certain in meaning, and capable of being performed. A clause that fails any one of these tests may be unenforceable, and in some cases may put the entire transaction at legal risk.
The Standard Structure of an Ontario APS
Standard (Boilerplate) Clauses
OREA (Ontario Real Estate Association) provides a standard APS form with pre-drafted, legally reviewed clauses covering price, closing date, property description, deposit handling, conditions, and representations. These clauses reflect years of legal refinement and should not be casually altered or deleted without legal advice.
Schedule A
Schedule A is where most custom negotiation happens. It lists included chattels (appliances, fixtures, window coverings), excluded items, and any additional conditions or representations agreed to by both parties. This is also where most clause errors occur — because it feels informal, people write imprecise language that later fails in disputes.
Additional Schedules (B, C, etc.)
Complex transactions — tenanted properties, new construction, assignment sales — may require additional schedules. Each schedule forms part of the contract and must be signed by both parties. Builder schedules in particular often contain lengthy clauses that are heavily weighted in the builder’s favour and deserve careful legal review.
Types of Custom Clauses That Are Legally Valid
Chattels and fixtures list
Specifically naming included or excluded items — fridge, washer/dryer, light fixtures, window coverings, garage door openers — with make/model if known.
Pre-closing repair conditions
Seller to complete named repairs by a specific date, to a defined standard, with proof of completion (licensed contractor, receipt, warranty) required before closing.
Rental equipment terms
Documenting whether rental items (water heater, water softener, HVAC) transfer with the buyer inheriting the lease, or are bought out by the seller prior to closing.
Occupancy arrangements
Early buyer possession or seller leaseback after closing, with clearly defined dates, occupancy fees, insurance responsibilities, and liability allocation.
Clauses That Will Not Hold Up
These clause types are legally problematic
- Discriminatory terms: Any clause restricting buyers based on race, religion, national origin, gender, or other protected characteristics violates the Ontario Human Rights Code and is void
- Statutory right waivers: Clauses attempting to strip a buyer of rights guaranteed under TRESA or other legislation are unenforceable
- Zoning violations: A clause stating the buyer may use the property in a way that contradicts current zoning does not override municipal law
- Hopelessly vague terms: Clauses that lack a defined meaning cannot be interpreted or enforced by a court
- Verbal commitments not in writing: Under the parol evidence rule, verbal promises made outside the contract generally cannot be introduced as evidence to modify contract terms
How Vague Clauses Fail — Real Scenarios
The basement repair clause that did nothing
What was written: “Seller agrees to fix the basement water issue before closing.”
What happened: The seller painted over the staining and considered it done. The buyer moved in to find active seepage. Because “fix” was undefined, the court found the clause too vague to enforce a specific standard of remediation.
What should have been written: “Seller to engage a licensed waterproofing contractor to install interior drainage system and sump pump, to a minimum cost of $X, with written warranty of Y years, documentation provided to buyer no later than 5 business days before closing.”
The appliances that disappeared at closing
What happened: Seller verbally agreed to leave the fridge, washer, and dryer. None of this was written into Schedule A. At closing, the appliances were gone. The buyer had no written record and no legal basis for a claim.
The lesson: Every item a buyer expects to be included must be explicitly named in Schedule A — including the brand if possible. “All appliances” is better than nothing, but “Samsung French door refrigerator, model XYZ” is better still.
The “buyer can exit anytime” clause
What was written: “Buyer reserves the right to cancel this agreement if not fully satisfied.”
The problem: Without a defined triggering condition (failed inspection, financing not arranged, title issue), this language reads like an unconditional offer with an exit right — which is legally uncertain at best. Sellers’ lawyers will reject this clause. A proper condition clause names the condition, the deadline for satisfaction or waiver, and consequences of each outcome.
Five Principles for Drafting Enforceable Clauses
- Be specific: Name exact items, amounts, and parties — avoid “all,” “appropriate,” or “reasonable” without a definition
- Set a measurable standard: Define what “done” looks like — receipts, warranties, licensed contractor
- Include deadlines: “Before closing” is less precise than “no later than 5 business days before the scheduled closing date”
- Write it down: If it matters, it must be in the contract — verbal agreements do not survive closing
- Have a lawyer review it: For any clause involving significant risk or unusual terms, legal review before signing is worth every dollar
Common Misconceptions That Lead to Legal Exposure
- Handwriting “seller responsible for all issues” on the APS — scope is undefined, courts cannot enforce it
- Assuming an amendment can fix problems post-offer — both parties must consent to any change in writing
- Believing what the agent says is legally binding — agents facilitate transactions but their verbal statements do not modify the written contract
- Thinking builder schedules are non-negotiable — many provisions can be negotiated, especially with legal counsel present
Frequently Asked Questions
Can buyers and sellers add custom clauses to an Ontario APS?
Yes, but with important limitations. Custom clauses must be clear, specific, and legally compliant. They cannot violate Ontario’s Human Rights Code, TRESA, or other applicable legislation. Ambiguous or unlawful clauses may be deemed unenforceable by a court, and in serious cases, could affect the validity of the entire contract.
What makes a contract clause unenforceable in Ontario real estate?
A clause is typically unenforceable if it: discriminates on protected grounds under the Ontario Human Rights Code; attempts to waive statutory rights guaranteed under TRESA; contradicts zoning or building code requirements; or is so vague that its meaning cannot be reasonably determined. Courts will not enforce what they cannot interpret.
What happens if a clause is too vague?
Vague clauses are interpreted by courts — often in ways neither party anticipated. For example, “seller agrees to repair the basement” without specifying scope, timeline, or standard gives the seller enormous latitude. Courts may find this clause too uncertain to enforce at all, leaving the buyer without recourse.
Do verbal promises from a seller hold up legally?
Generally no. In Ontario real estate, the written contract governs the transaction. Verbal commitments made during negotiations — appliances being left, repairs being completed, items being included — are legally unenforceable unless explicitly written into the APS or a Schedule. This is sometimes called the “parol evidence rule.”
Can a seller require the buyer to waive their home inspection right?
A seller can decline to accept offers that include a home inspection condition — that is a negotiating position, not a legal waiver. However, a clause purporting to permanently prohibit a buyer from ever inspecting the property, or to hold a seller harmless for conditions the buyer could have discovered through inspection, would be legally problematic. Buyers who choose to waive inspection conditions do so voluntarily.
Want Your Offer Clauses Reviewed Before You Sign?
I review every clause in an offer before it goes out — so your protections are real, not just words on paper.
Arthur Zhao · Real Estate Broker · FRI · ABR · SRS · MCNE · E-PRO · CLHMS & GUILD Elite · REAIS
VP & Branch Manager, Bay Street Group Inc.
Arthur Zhao
Real Estate Broker · FRI · ABR · SRS · PSA · MCNE · E-PRO · CLHMS & GUILD Elite · REAIS
VP & Branch Manager, Bay Street Group Inc.
Get expert answers on buying, selling, and renting in the GTA
Discover more from GTA Real Estate Broker | Arthur Zhao
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.